Legal Opinion

State v. Urig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 4, 2018No. A160695PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

*1197*694Defendant challenges his conviction for unlawful delivery of heroin and unlawful possession of heroin, methamphetamine, and controlled substances, ORS 475.850 ; ORS 475.854 ; ORS 475.894 ; ORS 475.752(3) and (3)(c). He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during what he contends was an unlawful extension of a traffic stop to call his probation officer. We conclude that, because the call to defendant's probation officer did not actually delay the processing of the traffic citation at issue, the stop was not unlawfully extended, and the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API