Legal Opinion

Stone v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 13, 2000No. 13-97-845-CRPublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel during his trial for delivery of a controlled substance when his attorney called him to testify and elicited from him testimony regarding a prior murder conviction that the State would not have been allowed to bring up otherwise. We hold that appellant has shown ineffective assistance of counsel and reverse and remand.

Stone was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance after a one-day jury trial and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and a $10,000 fíne. In 1980, Stone was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tanguma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. State v. CheathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Aldrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Huerta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API