Tanguma v. State

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

A jury found appellant, Charles Tangu-ma, guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation. 2 Appellant pleaded true to an enhancement paragraph alleging a prior felony conviction, and the trial court assessed his punishment at sixty years imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. By three points of error, appellant contends the court reporter’s failure to transcribe a complete record is reversible error, the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance, and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge any venire-persons for cause. We affirm.

I.…