Awtry v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are former officials of the Department of Agriculture, transferred or removed on a change of administration for reasons more or less political, and now holding different and less desirable government positions, or none. They claim the benefit of the first amendment rule which, as adumbrated in Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980), they say raises a bar against the personnel actions meted out to them. We hold that the petition of all of them must be dismissed as wanting equity, though for varied reasons. Our…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mexican Intermodal Equipment S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- San Carlos Irrigation & Drainage District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.