Legal Opinion

Hill v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Hill replevied certain personal property which had been seized by defendant as a tax collector, for a-balance of taxes not paid.

The item objected to was not a specific and separate tax, but a part of a single sum imposed for school taxes. The-whole tax assessed against plaintiff for various purposes was $41.42. This included school taxes amounting to $21.27. Plaintiff paid defendant $31.89, and refused to pay any more, on the ground that there had been included in the-school taxes of the town an unauthorized sum of which his proportion would be the amount withheld. Thereupon defendant seized…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. East Saginaw City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Travers v. InsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Briggson v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hood v. JudkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Forster v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Boyce v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API