Legal Opinion
Myers v. Cedar Grove Tp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 6, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. 51 (1961)
174 A.2d 890
JOHN E. MYERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 25, 1961.
Decided November 6, 1961.
Mr. Samuel Rosenblatt argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Nicholas H. Hagoort, Jr., of counsel, on the brief).
Mr. Francis F. Welsh argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a municipality which has adopted one of the plans of government under the Optional Municipal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Duke Power Co. v. PattenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Townsend v. Township of PequannockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Myers v. Township of Cedar GroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Stark v. FellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. City of Perth AmboyNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987
- Gauntt v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF CITY OF BRIDGETONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Body-Rite Repair Co. v. Taxation Div. DirectorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Planning Bd. Tp. of West Milford v. Tp. CouncilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.