Legal Opinion

Miraglia v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1933No. Appeal 335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The sole question raised on this appeal involves a consideration of the time within which a petition to modify, reinstate, suspend, or terminate agreements or awards may be presented under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, as amended by the Acts of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, §6, and April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, §6 (77 PS 772).

The claimant was injured on August 16, 1926, and compensation was paid to him for total disability pursuant to an agreement of the parties from August 27, 1926, to January 25, 1928. At that time, on petition of the defendant, the agreement for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Gairt v. Curry Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Johnson v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. McKissick v. Penn Brook Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Ludington v. Russell Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hill v. Booth & Flinn Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Augustine v. Evert Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Falls-Overfield Vocational School District v. DavisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. State Workmen's Insurance FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API