Legal Opinion
Koehler v. Sei Young Choi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*505The defendant Family Services, Inc. (hereinafter Family Services), served the plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3216, with a 90-day notice dated October 17, 2006, which the plaintiff received on October 18, 2006. The defendant Sei Young Choi did not serve his own 90-day notice. After the 90-day period for serving and filing a note of issue had expired, Family Services and Sei Young Choi separately moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. In response, the plaintiff cross-moved to extend her time to serve and file a note of issue. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Carnegie v. J.P. Phillips, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lugauer v. Forest City Ratner Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Zito v. JastremskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Walters v. Hoboken Wood Flooring Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michaels v. Sunrise Building & Remodeling, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mooney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Adbul v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Adbul v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kushmakova v. Meadow Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008