Anderson v. Pitt Iron Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $30,-000 for personal injuries. After the former appeal, the case was tried before Ensign, J\, and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,900. From an order denying defendant’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
' This cause was heard on a former appeal, and is reported in 103 Minn. 252, 114 N. W. 953. On the former trial a verdict was returned for plaintiff, and defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. 1 The trial court denied the motion for judgment, but granted a new trial. Defendant appealed, and insisted that on the evidence presented plaintiff could not recover, and that judgment should be ordered in its favor. The facts are fully stated in the former opinion, and need not be repeated. We there held that the evidence made a case for the jury on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Larson v. RingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Bergquist v. Chandler Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Anderson v. Pitt Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hannah v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982