Legal Opinion

KPIELE-PODA v. PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 2023No. 2023 OK 11 525 P.3d 28Published

1Opinion of the Court

OSCN Found Document:KPIELE-PODA v. PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY

Previous Case

Top Of Index

This Point in Index

Citationize

Next Case

Print Only

KPIELE-PODA v. PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY

2023 OK 11

525 P.3d 28

Case Number: 119375; Consol. w/119406

Decided: 02/14/2023

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2023 OK 11, 525 P.3d 28

MWANDE SERGE KPIELE-PODA, an individual, Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC., UNIVERSAL PRESSURE PUMPING, INC., SEVENTY SEVEN OPERATING, LLC, PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, CAMBELT INTERNATIONAL CORP., CAMBELT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, CAMBELT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, U.S. SILICA…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API