Legal Opinion
Gipson v. Mattox
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided January 12, 2007No. Civil Action 05-0601-WS-CPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, for Certification for Appeal (doc. 58). The Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition at this time.
I. Background.
Plaintiffs Bryan R. Gipson and Chem Technologies of Mississippi, Inc. (“Chem-Tech”) brought this patent action against defendant Mark A. Mattox pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq. Plaintiffs maintain that U.S. Patent No. 6,866,-048 (the “'048 Patent”) is invalid and that it was wrongly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Mas-Hamilton Group v. Lagard, Inc., (Now Known as Masco Corporation) and Hi-Shear Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Nelson v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Abrams v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Strawser v. StrangeDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2015
- Adderley v. NegronDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.