Legal Opinion
In Re Kerr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1996No. 95-BG-910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner, a clinical psychologist and former attorney, who was disbarred in May 1977 for having committed a crime (mail fraud) involving moral turpitude, seeks reinstatement. 1 Petitioner’s petition is fully supported by Bar Counsel, the Hearing Committee, and the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”).
The Board determined that petitioner “has met her burden of proving her fitness to practice law under the criteria set forth in In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215 (D.C.1985),” and recommends that the court reinstate petitioner. This rule, inter alia, allows reinstatement upon a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re RoxboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re MorrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re CourtoisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007