United States v. Ryder
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
On 8 May 1992, this Court ordered reconsideration of our decision of 27 April 1992, 34 M.J. 1077, in response to a motion by the Appellant. Subsequently, on 26 May 1992, Appellant filed the following assignments of error to be considered in addition to the three previously filed and adversely resolved by our earlier decision:
IV
APPELLANT’S CONVICTION MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE DUE PROCESS REQUIRES THAT A JUDGE IN A CRIMINAL CASE HAVE A FIXED TERM OF OFFICE. BUT SEE UNITED STATES v. GRAF, 32 M.J. 809 (N.M.C.M.R.1990), PETITION GRANTED, 33 M.J. 189 (C.M.A.1991) (MEM.).
V
APPELLANT’S COURT-MARTIAL…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GrafU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- Unted States v. PriveU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. RyderU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. RyderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- Unted States v. PriveU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. LynchU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. BeckermannU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.