Legal Opinion

Arthur v. McCallum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. Docket 148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; George W. Smith, J. Bill by Andrew L. Arthur against William McCallum for an accounting and other relief. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This is á bill filed to dissolve a co-partnership formed April 24, 1913, and for an accounting. Pending the hearing many of the matters were adjusted by stipulation, leaving few questions only for determination by the court. The plaintiff prevailed in the lower court, and the defendant appeals from the allowance of two items.

The partnership was formed to take over from the Detroit Trust Company as receiver in bankruptcy of the Flanders Manufacturing Company,' the sprayer pump business of that institution, some of the property being at Pontiac, and some at Chelsea, the price being $1,300. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emerson v. DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morris v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nogueras v. Maisel & AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Alford v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnson v. IronsideMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API