Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Whitehead

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1935No. 13271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

R. M. Whitehead instituted this suit in the county court of Hood county against W. D. Taylor to recover double the amount of usurious interest alleged to have been collected from him by defendant. It was alleged that plaintiff resides in Hood county and the defendant resides in Parker county.

Defendant pleaded his statutory privilege to be sued in Parker county, where he resides. That plea being in statutory form, the burden was upon plaintiff to overcome it by filing a controverting plea, under oath, setting out specifically the fact or facts relied upon to confer venue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ray v. W. W. Kimball Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Meadows & Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Koch v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Nolen v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Waco v. Del Rio Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hudson & Hudson Realtors v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Donald v. Agricultural Livestock Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Wheeler v. MetteauerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Colman v. H. Dittlinger Roller Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. National Mortgage Corp. of America v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API