Legal Opinion

Vance Trucking Co. v. Canal Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1968No. 10669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge:

Different phases of this litigation have heretofore been in the federal courts. The case was here once before on a question not now involved in this appeal and was remanded to the district court for further proceedings.1 On remand the district court made necessary findings of fact and stated its conclusion that both Vance Trucking Company (Vance) and Forrester Trucking Company (For-rester), and their insurers, must defend in a tort action in the district court which precipitated this controversy.2 Since the district court there stated the facts in detail it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vance Trucking Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  2. Murdaugh v. Traders & Mechanics Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Graham v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Cave v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  5. Laurens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Daily Express, Inc. v. Northern Neck Transfer Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Johnson v. Motors Dispatch, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Kastner v. ToombsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Canal Ins. Co. v. TL James & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API