Legal Opinion

Gelderloos v. Duke

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2004No. 02-568PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶ 1 Defendant Roger Zeman appeals the District Court’s judgment in which Defendant Roxanne Duke and Plaintiffs Wayne C. and Catherine O. Mansaw were granted a prescriptive easement for a road across his property, and the Mansaws were also granted a prescriptive easement for the encroachment of the eaves of their residence. We reverse.

ISSUES

¶2 1. Did the District Court err when it concluded that a prescriptive easement for road access to the Duke and Mansaw properties existed across Zeman’s property?

¶3 2. Did the District Court err when it concluded that a prescriptive easement existed for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wareing v. SchreckendgustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Brumit v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Amerimont, Inc. v. GannettMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nimmick v. HartMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re J.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Leisz v. Avista Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bonnie M. Combs-DeMaio Living Trust v. Kilby Butte Colony, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wolf v. OwensMontana Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API