Gelderloos v. Duke
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶ 1 Defendant Roger Zeman appeals the District Court’s judgment in which Defendant Roxanne Duke and Plaintiffs Wayne C. and Catherine O. Mansaw were granted a prescriptive easement for a road across his property, and the Mansaws were also granted a prescriptive easement for the encroachment of the eaves of their residence. We reverse.
ISSUES
¶2 1. Did the District Court err when it concluded that a prescriptive easement for road access to the Duke and Mansaw properties existed across Zeman’s property?
¶3 2. Did the District Court err when it concluded that a prescriptive easement existed for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wareing v. SchreckendgustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Brumit v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Amerimont, Inc. v. GannettMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Nimmick v. HartMontana Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re J.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Leisz v. Avista Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Bonnie M. Combs-DeMaio Living Trust v. Kilby Butte Colony, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
- AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Wolf v. OwensMontana Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.