Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Woodrum Truck Lines
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 13, 1930No. 12394PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
BUCK, J.
Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease on the ground that the order overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial was made on the 20th day of December, 1929. Court adjourned on the 21st day of December, 1929. The appeal bond was filed on •the 11th day of January, 1930. Article 2253 of the Rev. Civ. Statutes of 1925, as amended by the Fortieth Legislature, c. 15, p. 21, § 1, requiring the filing of appeal bonds, reads as f ob lows:
“An appeal may, in cases where an appeal is allowed, -be taken during the term of the court at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. O'BrienMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Kolp v. ShraderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Edens v. CleavesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Rose Mfg. Co. v. ShahadyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Sirmons v. PittmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Woodrum Truck Lines v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.