Legal Opinion
Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability Plan
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 6, 2008No. CV 06-0754 AG (FMOx)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
ORDER AFFIRMING ADMINISTRATOR’S DENIAL OF LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Samuel Salomaa (“Plaintiff’) is a former employee of American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Mr. Salomaa filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. section 1001, et seq., seeking long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits from the American Honda Welfare Benefits Plan (the “Plan”) administered and insured by Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”). Plaintiff asserts that he suffers from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (“CFS”),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Marjorie Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Burtch v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Holifield v. UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.