Legal Opinion
Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2011No. 08-55426PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
642 F.3d 666 (2011)
Samuel SALOMAA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HONDA LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, an Erisa Plan, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-55426.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 4, 2009.
Filed March 7, 2011.
Amended May 26, 2011.
Charles J. Fleishman, Northridge, CA, for the appellant.
Melissa M. Cowan, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee.
Before: CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL,[1] ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge HALL.
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 7, 2011 is amended as follows:
A…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clemente v. Fbi, D.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- McWatters v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Schubert v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024