Hope v. Seahorse, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
I. Introduction
This is a medical malpractice action instituted against the United States by virtue of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (Supp.1976 and Supp.1981). The United States, in administering medical treatment to Captain Tom Hope pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 249, had a duty to provide proper medical diagnosis and treatment as would have been provided by any other health care provider in the State of Texas. Plaintiffs contend that a breach of that duty gives rise to the cause of action at bar.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin v. BlackmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Larsen v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1988
- Franklin v. BlackmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003