Hayes v. City of Loveland
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this inverse condemnation suit against the City of Loveland, George L. Hayes and Dorothea M. Hayes seek damages based on the City’s reconstruction of a power line running across an easement on the Hayes’ property acquired by the City by prescription. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal by petitioners, we affirm.
The petitioners first argue that the new power line constitutes an increased and therefore compensable burden upon their land, and that they are entitled to damages to the remainder of their property. The petitioners concede that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Westland Nursing Home, Inc. v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Rogers v. Lower Clear Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Enke v. City of GreeleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Burkhart v. JacobSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Clinger v. HartshornColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Logan County Conservation District v. Pleasant Oaks Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Florida Power v. SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.