Legal Opinion
Leist v. Union Oil Co. of California
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 30, 1979No. 78-C-769PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendant has moved for a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and fo.r an order staying the discovery from the defendant until its motion for a protective order is ■ decided.
On March 21, 1979, the plaintiff served a notice on the defendant that the deposition of Donald P. Morris, an employee of the defendant residing in Cincinnati, Ohio, would be taken in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on March 30, 1979. The defendant urges that it is inappropriate to conduct the deposition of Mr. Morris in Milwaukee because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Terry v. Modern WoodmenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
- Thompson v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Baker v. Standard Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Cadent Ltd. v. 3M Unitek Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Turner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Frank S. Sinkwich, Inc. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988
- Bauer v. WinkelDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1981