Legal Opinion

Monday v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1933No. 15803PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The facts are sufficient to show that appellant possessed intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale, and we see no good reason for setting them out at length.

We find ten bills of exception. Bills 1, 2, 3 and 4 bring forward complaints of the action of the court below in sustaining the state’s objection to four similar questions asked the prosecuting witness Thurman. He was asked as follows: “You are guilty, or have been charged with stealing turkeys?” The qualification…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith and Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Deuran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API