Legal Opinion

Wohl v. Swinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2008No. 2007-0593PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This certified conflict from the Twelfth District Court of Appeals asks us to decide whether an insurance policy definition is ambiguous and thus properly construed against the insurer. The term “insured” is defined as including “[a]ny other person occupying your covered auto who is not a named insured or insured family member for uninsured motorists coverage under another policy.” We hold that this definition of “insured” is not ambiguous.

Case History

{¶ 2} This case arises out of a claim for uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage for personal injuries resulting from an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Carter v. Division of WaterOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Independent Insurance v. FabeOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State ex rel. AutoZone Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Lublinsussman Grp. LLP v. Lee, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County2018
  4. Chandler-McPhail v. DuffeyColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API