Legal Opinion
Bashford-Burmister Co. v. Hammons
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1930No. Civil Nos. 2785, 2786PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
These two cases were consolidated in the trial court, and are here presented upon the one record. Both are suits to reach and subject the assets of the Prescott State Bank, hereinafter referred to as the insolvent or the insolvent bank, to their claims of indebtedness and for a preference. The defendants Hammons and Wood are, respectively, state superintendent of banks and deputy and as such the receivers thereof. The insolvent bank had been from at least December 19th, 1918, if not earlier, up to the date of its failure, November 25th, 1925, a designated depository of the county of Yavapai…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Martin v. Niagara Falls Paper Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Central Bank v. LowdermilkArizona Supreme Court · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. MooremanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Bledsoe v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Mutual Life Insurance v. MooremanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966