Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Lothrop

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 5, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is a bill in equity, under the Pub. Sts. c. 151, § 2, cl. 11, by a judgment creditor of the defendant, Mary W. Lothrop, to reach and apply, upon his debt, her interest in a trust fund held by the defendant, the Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company. The case was heard upon the pleadings and agreed facts, and two questions were reserved: First, Can the plaintiff reach the principal of the trust fund? Second, Can the plaintiff reach the income of the trust fund ?

The material provisions of the will of Israel Ward, the father of Mrs. Lothrop, under which she derives her interest, are as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Jaques v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal ChurchCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1820
  3. Pacific National Bank v. WindramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Sparhawk v. CloonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Russell v. MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Young v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. CollierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Lamberton v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Nunn v. Titche-Goettinger Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API