Legal Opinion

Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Collier

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1916PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Bill in' equity, filed in the Probate Court on November 25, 1914, by the trustee under the will of Maturin M. Ballou, late of Boston, for instructions as to whether, under the ninth clause of the will, set out in the opinion, a distributive share of Franklin B. Ballou should be paid to him or to his trustee in bankruptcy, the defendant Forrest F. Collier.

Read the full summary

Bill in' equity, filed in the Probate Court on November 25, 1914, by the trustee under the will of Maturin M. Ballou, late of Boston, for instructions as to whether, under the ninth clause of the will, set out in the opinion, a distributive share of Franklin B. Ballou should be paid to him or to his trustee in bankruptcy, the defendant Forrest F. Collier. In the Probate Court, where the suit was heard upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, Grant, J., ordered a decree directing that the share be paid to Franklin B. Ballou. On appeal from that decree the case was reserved for this…

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The testator, in the ninth clause of his will, provided, “It is my will that every payment of income or principal hereinbefore directed or devised to be made, shall be made personally to the persons to whom they are devised or upon their order or receipt in writing, in either case free from the interference or control of the creditors of such persons and never by way of anticipation or assignment.”

By other clauses he left the residue of his estate in trust to pay to his widow and to his son Murray R. Ballou, in equal shares, the net income for life and upon the death of his son the income…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Claflin v. ClaflinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Barnes Foundation v. KeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Saltonstall v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Kelly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tramell v. TramellTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API