Legal Opinion

Ness v. Yeomans

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, a physician and surgeon, is charged with malpractice arising from the setting and treatment of a broken arm. The jury found for the plaintiff and, the court having denied a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, the defendant appeals.

There are 87 assignments of errors, 66 of which deal with rulings on the admission of testimony, 17 with reference to the charge given to the jury and the remainder with rulings on the motion for a new trial, etc. In addition there is a specific allegation that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

On the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitson v. HillisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Axford v. GainesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gallagher v. KermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ladlie v. American Glycerin Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benzmiller v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stokes v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Klein v. HarperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Collom v. PiersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API