Legal Opinion
Claim of Martin v. New York Telephone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 29, 2006, which directed that the award of workers’ compensation benefits be paid by the Special Fund for Reopened Cases pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a.
Claimant injured his left knee in 1987 for which he received workers’ compensation benefits and was found to have suffered a 15% schedule loss of use. Claimant reinjured the knee in 1995, filed a second workers’ compensation claim and again was awarded benefits.
In August 1998, claimant and his employer entered into a Workers’ Compensation Law § 32 settlement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Claim of Bates v. Finger Lakes Truck RentalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Huang Sheng Ku v. Dana Alexander, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Robinson v. Holiday Showcase Restaurants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Guidice v. Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Beers v. Jump Start Advanced AcademicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Goutremout v. Advance Auto PartsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Guadagno v. RIC Steel ErectorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Pilacik v. Jacsa, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018