Legal Opinion
Filmtec Corporation v. Hydranautics
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 23, 1996No. 94-1034Published
1Opinion of the Court
67 F.3d 931
1995-2 Trade Cases P 71,145, 32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1199,
36 U.S.P.Q.2d 1410
FILMTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HYDRANAUTICS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-1034.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Oct. 12, 1995.
Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined
Jan. 23, 1996.
James R. Martin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Bernd W. Sandt and Gary C. Cohn, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, were on the brief, for plaintiff-appellee.
Carl W. Schwarz, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant.…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.