Legal Opinion

Walter Implement, Inc. v. Focht

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 7, 1985No. 6190-6-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

—This case involves the question of whether a liquidated damages clause in a preprinted equipment lease form is a proper remedy following the lessee's default. The trial court upheld the liquidated damages clause. We reverse.

In 1980, Donald Focht, a farmer, contacted Walter Implement, Inc., about obtaining a replacement for his old tractor. After conferring with James Walter, manager and president of Walter Implement, Mr. Focht entered into a 5-year lease agreement of an Allis-Chalmers tractor, disc, plow and two cultipackers. The parties signed an Allis-Chalmers Credit Corporation standard…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Northwest Acceptance Corporation v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API