Walter Implement, Inc. v. Focht
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
—This case involves the question of whether a liquidated damages clause in a preprinted equipment lease form is a proper remedy following the lessee's default. The trial court upheld the liquidated damages clause. We reverse.
In 1980, Donald Focht, a farmer, contacted Walter Implement, Inc., about obtaining a replacement for his old tractor. After conferring with James Walter, manager and president of Walter Implement, Mr. Focht entered into a 5-year lease agreement of an Allis-Chalmers tractor, disc, plow and two cultipackers. The parties signed an Allis-Chalmers Credit Corporation standard…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Department of Labor & Industries v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Northwest Acceptance Corporation v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.