Legal Opinion

Holm-Waddle v. William D. Hawley, M.D., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1998No. 88650PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

¶ 1 This appeal raises three issues regarding admission of evidence in the jury trial of a medical malpractice action. First, is mere membership in a mutual medical malpractice insurance company admissible to demonstrate bias or prejudice on the part of a defense expert when the defendant is also a member? It is not. Second, was evidence of an undisclosed autopsy properly excluded? It was. Third, did the trial court abuse its discretion by allowing defense counsel’s comments during voir dire? It did not. Because no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated, the trial court’s judgment on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Jordan v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Mills v. GrotheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Barker v. BledsoeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Western States Construction Company v. StaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnett v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Barnett v. SimmonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Blackmer v. Cookson Hills Electric Coop., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Hull v. HullCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Manpower, Inc. v. BrawdyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API