Legal Opinion

Dutzler v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1933No. Criminal No. 786PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The defendant Dutzler was convicted of the crime defined by section 4651, Revised Code of 1928, described by the medical term of fellatio. He has appealed, and among other errors assigns that the court erred in denying his motion for an instructed verdict on the ground of insufficient evidence to take the case 'to the jury. There is no evidence of the act other than that of the boy who par ticipated in the act with defendant. Under section 4491, Id., all persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether they directly commit it or aid and abet in its commission, except children under 14…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. State v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. People v. ElgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pueblo v. Montalvo AcevedoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. State v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. PowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API