Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Koppers Industries, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 21, 1996No. 1-94-3877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hourihane

Plaintiff, Bruce Cockrell, filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Koppers Industries, Inc. (Koppers), sounding in negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct. In the complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was severely burned while working on Koppers’ property. The case eventually proceeded to trial, and a jury returned a verdict finding defendant negligent. Koppers then filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment n.o.v.) or, alternatively, for a new trial. The circuit court denied the motion, and Koppers appealed. 134 Ill. 2d R. 303(a). We reverse the denial of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bazydlo v. VolantIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Brown v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Briney v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. GREEN BY FRITZ v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Eshoo v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Avemco Insurance v. Elliott Aviation Flight Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. Eshoo v. CTAAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. GREEN BY FRITZ v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API