Legal Opinion

Eshoo v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1999No. 1-97-1138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CAHILL

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint against the Chicago Transit Authority (the CTA) in response to an electrocution at the CTA Morse Avenue transit station in Chicago. The complaint alleged negligence in count I and willful and wanton conduct in count II. Plaintiffs dismissed the willful and wanton count before the case went to the jury in response to a trial court ruling that decedent was an invitee as a matter of law. The trial court found, as a matter of law, that Taylor Eshoo was an invitee to whom the CTA owed a duty of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Duffy v. CortesiIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Salazar v. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Salazar v. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Cole v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025
  5. Debra Jo Robeson v. Vieth Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API