Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. Frazier
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “A statement in an application for reinstatement of a policy of insurance, rendered necessary by the lapse of the same, that the insured is in ‘good health,’ is not to be construed as a warranty that his health is absolutely perfect, but only that his health is practically the same as it was when the policy was issued.” Massachusetts Benefit Life Asso. v. Robinson, 104 Ga. 256 (10), 289 (30 S. E. 918, 42 L. R. A. 261); Atlantic & Birmingham R. Co. v. Douglas, 119 Ga. 658 (2) (46 S. E. 867). Accordingly, where, in a suit on a policy of life-insurance, commonly called an “industrial policy,”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Ancient Order United Workmen v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Cherokee Life Insurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Turner v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Bray v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.