Legal Opinion
McDole v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided September 30, 2005No. A-8743PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Roy Erwin McDole unlawfully claimed unemployment benefits for two years. A jury convicted McDole of thirty-one counts of un-sworn falsification and one count of second-degree theft. 1 The State charged only one theft count by aggregating all the periodic payments McDole received through the two-year course of misconduct. 2 McDole illegally obtained a total sum in excess of $10,000.
McDole had been unconditionally discharged from a prior felony conviction in 1991. The statutory ten-year period during which this prior felony would make McDole a second felony offender for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Haag v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- State v. SaathoffAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
- Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- Haywood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.