Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Zalk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 23, 2007Published

1Dissent

Sweeny, J. (dissenting).

I am compelled to dissent on a matter of law. Specifically, I disagree with the majority’s determination that the Dead Man’s Statute (CPLR 4519) does not apply in all phases of a disciplinary proceeding. The history of our Court and the language of the statute dictate otherwise.

The majority correctly applies the statute in addressing the substance of the proceedings, yet inexplicably and, I submit, without foundation, simply rules it does not apply in determining an appropriate sanction. This is not only a misreading of Matter of Prounis (230 AD2d 55, 57 [1997]), but a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re ProunisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API