Legal Opinion
Marker v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1934No. 5454PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
This case is here on writ of certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying application of plaintiff for compensation from a special fund administered by the Industrial Commission and known as the employees’ combined injury benefit fund. Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 3140, as amended by Laws of Utah 1919, c. 63, p. 163, as amended by Laws of Utah 1921, c. 67, p. 176; R. S. Utah 1933, 42-1-64.
Plaintiff in his petition before the commission alleged an injury while working in Colorado in 1903 resulting in total blindness of the right eye; that subsequently…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Branconnier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Mercur Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. SpryUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Wabash Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McPhie v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Second Injury Fund v. Streator ChevroletUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- McPhie v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Second Injury Fund v. Streator ChevroletUtah Supreme Court · 1985