Legal Opinion

Holbert v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 2, 1958No. 3269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is a suit to collect $10,000 which represents the proceeds of bonds allegedly owned by the plaintiff and cashed by his father, George W. Holbert, and used to pay taxes of the father to the Government. The suit was originally for a sum in excess of $10,000 but plaintiff has waived his claim for any sum in excess of $10,000. Jurisdiction is based on Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (2), common! y referred to as the “Tucker Act.” The pertinent part of this Act is as follows:

“(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the Court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelter Island & Greenport Ferry Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API