Legal Opinion

In re M.T.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2002No. 01-800PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 After two and a half years of intervention by the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS), and implementation of four treatment plans for A.F., the Twenty-First Judicial District Court entered an order terminating A.F.’s parental rights as to her four children, M.T., T.T., D.T., and B.W. The court concluded that M.T., T.T., D.T., and B.W., were youths in need of care, that appropriate treatment plans for A.F. had not been complied with or had not been successful, and that the conduct or condition rendering A.F. unfit was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. A.F.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re E.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re Declaring E.W.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re C.M.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re T.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re A.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re D.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API