Legal Opinion

United States v. Freeto Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1977No. 75-1747PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought under the Miller Act by the use plaintiff, Clark Engineering Company, against Freeto Construction Co. and its surety for the sum of $13,992.65 due Clark Engineering for the furnishing of certain fabricated materials and performance of certain labor pursuant to a subcontract with Freeto, the prime contractor. 40 U.S.C. § 270f. By answer Freeto admitted owing Clark $13,992.65 under the subcontract. In its answer Freeto also asserted a counterclaim based on Clark’s alleged failure to timely perform under the subcontract and sought judgment in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Cave Construction, Inc., a Corporation v. United States of America, Suing Herein for the Use and Benefit of Angell Bros, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Bearden v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Oklahoma State Fair Exposition v. Lippert Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Freeto Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API