Legal Opinion

Balzer MacHinery Co. v. Klineline Sand & Gravel Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1975PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Does the holder of a nonpossessory artisan’s lien have priority over the holder of a prior perfected security interest? That is the principal issue.

Plaintiff, Balzer Machinery Co., brought this suit to foreclose its nonpossessory lien. The lien arose out of repairs made to certain rock crushing equipment which was being operated by defendant Klineline Sand & Gravel Co. under a lease-purchase agreement. The defendant Clark Leasing Corp. was the assignee of the lessor-vendor’s interest. Clark subsequently repossessed the rock crusher and sold it to the defendant Spencer. Klineline is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Forrest Cate Ford, Inc. v. FryarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Thorp Commercial Corp. v. MISS. ROAD SUPPLYMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API