Legal Opinion

Tankel v. Seiberling Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 1951No. 29670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, injured in an automobile accident allegedly caused by a defective tire or. tube which blew out while plaintiffs were driving their Cadillac on a Texas highway, seek to recover damages from Seiberling Rubber Company. The gravamen of the complaint is that defendant rubber company manufactured and mounted a tire and tube negligently and were negligent in manufacture of the same.

Defendant Seiberling has moved for change of venue to the District Court sitting in Pecos, Texas, in which district the accident occurred. Defendant alleges that convenience of parties…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grubs v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1960
  2. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Harry Winston, Inc. v. Zale Jewelry Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API