Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of Taxation
New Jersey Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
MENYUK, J.T.C.
This constitutes the court’s decision following trial of the above-referenced matters. At issue is whether L. 2001, c. 101 (hereinafter “Chapter 101”), amending N.J.S.A. 54:4-23, was unlawfully applied in these cases.2 The court previously rejected challenges to the facial constitutionality of Chapter 101 in a published decision, Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of Taxation, 23 N.J.Tax 390 (2007).
In general terms and as applicable here, Chapter 101 provides that if an assessor has reason to believe that property comprising a part of the taxing district has been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- New Jersey State League of Municipalities v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Township of West Milford v. Van DeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Town of Secaucus v. Hudson County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Township AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2009