Legal Opinion
Rauseo v. Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-12026-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
This suit arises out of plaintiffs' claim that 1) Marco Tammaro violated federal environmental laws by filling his property with pollutants and 2) the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers failed to investigate and sanction Tammaro's noncompliance with federal laws.
I. Background
A. Factual Background
Stephanie Rauseo ("Rauseo") lives in the Apple Hill neighborhood of Lynnfield, Massachusetts, adjacent to the property at issue in this action ("the Property"). Rauseo, along with a local citizens' group, Apple Hill Neighbors Group ("Apple Hill plaintiffs") (collectively…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mashni v. US Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Ramos-Carrasquillo v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021