LOVEJOY v. Georgeff
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion By
Jacobs, J.,
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In granting the motion, the lower court held that the 2-year statute of limitations which applies to personal injury actions had run in favor of the estate of an alleged tort-feasor. The plaintiffs have appealed. We affirm.
Plaintiff Robert Lovejoy, a minor, was injured on November 8, 1968, when the car in wMch he was riding as a passenger collided with a telephone pole. Plaintiff Roy Lovejoy, his father, incurred certain medical expenses on his son’s behalf as a result of the accident. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. EggenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Thompson v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Abrams WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Purman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Leber v. KauffeltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Prevish v. Northwest Medical Center—Oil City CampusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Irrera v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Marzella v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- D'ORAZIO v. Locust Lake Village, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- McGuire v. Erie Lackawanna Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.