Appeal of Conservation Law Foundation of New England, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Dissent
King, C.J., and Batchelder, J.,
dissenting: This $525 million proposal is the largest utility financing in New Hampshire history. *649Moreover, it represents but a fraction of the $1.7 billion investment of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH or company) in the first unit of the ill-starred Seabrook nuclear plant, currently projected to cost $4.7 billion. In sanctioning this proposal, the court paves the way for an extraordinary and potentially disastrous increase in PSNH rates. The repercussions of this decision will extend for decades.
We are convinced that the order of the public…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Legislative Utility Consumers' Council v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.