Legal Opinion

Uniloc Luxembourg v. eClinicalWorks, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 29, 2013No. Case No. CV13-3244-MWF (PLAx)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT [35, 37] AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY [36]

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.

This patent action is before the Court on three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants eClinicalWorks, LLC and Pulse Systems, Inc. (Docket Nos. 35, 36, 37). Pulse Systems and eClinicalWorks separately move for summary judgment of non-infringement (Docket Nos. 35, 37) and jointly move for summary judgment of invalidity of the subject patent (U.S. Patent No. 5,682,526 or the “'526 Patent”). (Docket…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API